Earlier today, it was announced that yesterday's trilogue discussions on the Omnibus II Directive (Omnibus II) had finished in agreement. The announcement puts to rest recent uncertainty about the future of the Solvency II Directive and sets in train a timetable bringing the new regime into force from the beginning of 2016. Of more immediate concern, a consultation paper issued by the PRA (CP9/13) in October describes its approach to guidelines published by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) that address Member State preparations for Solvency II (the Guidelines).
Issues for firms
- Detailed requirements of the Solvency II regime are only likely to be finalised some time in 2015. This is very late given the 1 January 2016 start date proposed by the second "Quick Fix" Directive that is currently making its way through the EU legislative process.
- Because the Guidelines are addressed to Member State regulatory authorities, they are not binding on firms.
- The PRA does not propose to make new rules reflecting the requirements of the Guidelines. Nonetheless, it expects firms to comply with them to the extent specified in a Supervisory Statement (i.e. in guidance).
- The PRA argues that it has not sought to set substantially new expectations of firms and, in any case, that the Guidelines in many respects reflect work that firms should be doing to prepare for Solvency II. Where PRA expectations do extend beyond current requirements, we question its use of guidance instead of rules.
Firms only have until tomorrow, 15 November, to comment on the PRA's proposals in CP9/13. To read our longer briefing, click here.
Key contacts
Karen Anderson
Consultant, London
Susannah Cogman
Partner, London
Elizabeth Head
Of Counsel, London
Marina Reason
Partner, London
Kelesi Blundell
Partner, London
Hywel Jenkins
Partner, London
Chris Ninan
Partner, London
Jon Ford
Partner, London
Clive Cunningham
Consultant, London
Simone Hui
Of Counsel, Hong Kong
Chee Hian Kwah
Director, Prolegis LLC, Singapore
Valerie Tao
Knowledge Lawyer, Hong Kong
Cat Dankos
Senior Regulatory Consultant, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.