Our latest UPC briefing Three years of the UPC - a court coming of age is out now. In it we look back at developments in the last six months since our previous update in Q1 2026.
In this latest briefing, we start our coverage with a special focus on jurisdiction (including long-arm jurisdiction), the Court of Appeal's role in harmonising the UPC’s case law and interpretation of the UPC Agreement and Rules of Procedure.
We also provide insights from our German and Italian practices on how the courts are developing on the ground in their jurisdictions.
We also consider what the newly launched UPC Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre has to offer, and offer some thoughts on how the end of the transition period might play out, as well as our usual collection of statistics and graphics to help you get the full picture of how the UPC is developing.
In the main body of the briefing we examine specific developments since January including on:
- jurisdiction (including internal and long arm jurisdiction);
- validity;
- infringement;
- provisional measures (including the assessment of the balance of interests and delay);
and more.
For background on the structure and function of the UPC, as well as our latest UPC news blog posts, see the HSF Kramer UPC and unitary patent hub.
If you would like to discuss the UPC in further detail, please contact any member of our IP team, including those below.
Key contacts
Sebastian Moore
Partner, Head Intellectual Property, London and Milan
Sara Balice
Partner, Milan
Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky
Partner, Germany
Andrew Wells
Partner, London
Laura Orlando
Managing Partner, Milan Office, Milan
Emily Bottle
Partner, London and Milan
Dr. Philipp Cepl
Partner, Germany
Peter Dalton
Partner, London
Dr. Ina vom Feld
Partnerin, Germany
Pietro Pouché
Partner, Milan
Andrew Moir
Partner, Intellectual Property and Head of Cyber Security and Data, London
Jonathan Turnbull
Partner, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.