In a recent decision, the High Court has granted summary judgment in favour of a French bank seeking declarations that: (i) the English courts had exclusive jurisdiction under the jurisdiction clause contained in the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement (which applied to the transactions in dispute); and (ii) proceedings commenced in Italy by an Italian municipal authority were therefore commenced in breach of that clause: Dexia S.A. v Comune di Torino [2025] EWHC 1903 (Comm).
This decision is one of a number of judgments in recent years relating to swaps entered into by Italian public authorities. The English court has once again taken a robust approach to interpreting a jurisdiction clause, confirming its appreciation of the importance of market certainty and predictability in the interpretation of standard form ISDA documentation.
For more information see this post on our Banking Litigation Notes blog.
Key contacts
Ceri Morgan
Knowledge Counsel, London
Camilla Macpherson
Knowledge Lawyer, London
Nora van Meerwijk
Associate, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.