When learning of a potential criminal or regulatory issue – whether through receipt of an information request from the authorities or through an internal mechanism – a firm will usually conduct an internal investigation, whose purpose is to understand the scope of the issue, remediate the problem and formulate a response to regulators and prosecutors, civil plaintiffs and other constituencies.

It is imperative that the internal investigation be conducted so as to maximise the protections of legally applicable privileges. If privilege is protected from the outset, the company can then determine the extent to which privileged materials should be withheld from regulators or civil plaintiffs, or the extent to which the company will waive the privilege.

This article examines the differences in approach to privilege issues under US and English law, and suggests some measures companies can take to maximise the privilege protections in the conduct of internal investigations.

Download article


 

An extract from the 2020 edition of Americas Investigations Review. The whole publication is available at https://globalinvestigationsreview.com/edition/1001369/americas-investigations-review-2020

 

Key contacts

Scott S. Balber photo

Scott S. Balber

Head of Litigation, US and Managing Partner, New York Office, New York

Kathryn Boyd photo

Kathryn Boyd

Senior Associate, London

Stay in the know

Receive timely insights and briefings from HSF Kramer, tailored to keep you informed and ahead

Subscribe now
London New York White collar crime and government investigations Investigations Scott S. Balber John O'Donnell Kathryn Boyd