Key online safety measures and status
 

Key online safety measures

Status

Additional commentary regarding status

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) >

Law

Came into effect in April 2000.  Amendments to the COPPA implementing regulations (the COPPA Rule) took effect on 23 June 2025, with most provisions requiring compliance by 22 April 2026.

The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act” of 2017 (FOSTA) and the “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act” of 2017 (SESTA; together, FOSTA-SESTA)

Law

Came into effect in April 2018.

The "Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act” of 2025 (the TAKE IT DOWN Act)

Law

Came into effect in May 2025.

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act 2.0 (COPPA 2.0)

Draft law

COPPA 2.0 was reintroduced as proposed legislation in March 2025 in the current Congress.  It has not become law.

Online Health and Safety for Children and Youth: Best Practices for Families and Guidance for Industry >

Guidance

Published by the White House Task Force on Kids Online Health and Safety.


  Key concepts

   Scope of online safety measure(s)

COPPA applies to operators of commercial websites and online services that target children under 13, that have actual knowledge that they are collecting information from children under 13, or if the operators of the website or service have actual knowledge that they collect personal information from a third-party website or online service that targets children under 13.

FOSTA-SESTA creates an exception to the immunity granted to providers of interactive computer services such as social media platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.  Specifically, FOSTA-SESTA amended Section 230 to clarify that online platforms may be subject to civil or criminal liability for knowingly assisting, facilitating, or supporting sex trafficking.

The TAKE IT DOWN Act likewise amended Section 230 to impose a new takedown duty on covered online platforms.  Platforms must remove non-consensual intimate visual depictions of persons, including AI-generated “deepfake” images, upon receipt of valid notice.


   Online harms addressed

COPPA remains the primary US federal law protecting the privacy of children and is intended to give parents control over the online collection, use, and disclosure of information from their children. The law is designed to empower parents to review and amend personal information collected about their children and prevent its use (or require its deletion) by covered online websites and online service providers.  It is also intended to prevent covered entities from conditioning a child’s participation in online activities on the child’s disclosure of more personal information than is reasonably necessary for the activity and to require covered entities to put in place adequate procedures to protect the confidentiality, security, and integrity of any personal information that is collected from children.

FOSTA-SESTA are intended to ensure that covered online platforms can be held accountable under US federal and state laws related to sex trafficking, to ensure that such online platforms are not used to facilitate sex trafficking.

The TAKE IT DOWN Act is intended to address the increasing harm caused by the non-consensual publication of intimate images online, which has been exacerbated by the growth of AI-generated “deepfake” images and was not adequately addressed by existing laws.


   Territorial scope

Non-US websites and online services must comply with COPPA if they are directed to children in the US, or they knowingly collect personal information from children in the US.  

FOSTA-SESTA amended the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which expressly authorizes extraterritorial application under 18 U.S.C. § 1596 for trafficking offenses committed outside of the United States when committed by US nationals or permanent residents or when the alleged offender is present within the United States, regardless of nationality.

The TAKE IT DOWN Act does not specifically address extraterritorial scope, but the law applies broadly to any “covered platform,” ie, any website, online service, online application, or mobile application, that  either (i) primarily provide a forum for user-generated content or (ii) is primarily intended to publish non-consensual intimate visual depictions.

 


   Penalties and enforcement

Violations of COPPA and the TAKE IT DOWN Act are treated as “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act).  The Federal Trade Commission may seek injunctive relief, civil monetary penalties, and other forms of redress for consumers authorized by the FTC Act.  For 2025, the fine per violation is up to  $53,088 .  The FTC regularly brings enforcement actions for violation of COPPA.

FOSTA-SESTA created new criminal and civil liability for covered online platforms.  Under 18 U.S.C. 2421A,  penalties for owning, managing, or operating a covered online platform with the intent to promote or facilitate prostitution include fines and up to 10 years of imprisonment.  Certain “aggravated” violations for owning, managing, or operating a covered platform with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of five or more persons or acting in reckless disregard of the fact that such conduct contributed to sex trafficking carries fines and penalties of up to 25 years of imprisonment.



  Key takeaways
 

While our focus in the above is on US federal law, developments in “online safety” legislation in the United States are primarily occurring on the state level. Various US states have enacted or are in the process of enacting innovative legislation on a range of online safety issues that impose new obligations and responsibilities upon operators of covered websites and online platforms, including, but not limited to, (i) age verification and “age estimation” requirements; (ii) imposition of a duty of care to prevent harm (including “addiction”) to children; and (iii) requiring online platforms to facilitate filtering of online content by parents. However, state-based online safety legislation is subject to ongoing litigation challenges throughout the United States, which include challenges under the First Amendment to the US Constitution and Section 230.

On the federal level, COPPA remains the primary tool of Federal Trade Commission to enforce standards for the protection of the personal information of children under 13. While various proposals for reform and expansion of online safety legislation on the federal level are pending before the US Congress (e.g., the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and COPPA 2.0), these proposals have not been enacted into law. On the other hand, the FTC’s amendments to the COPPA Rule in 2025 made a number of changes that were designed to enhance existing protections for children, including, but not limited to, (i) strengthening parents’ opt-in consent rights for targeted advertising and other disclosures made by covered websites and online platforms to third parties; (ii) requiring covered websites and online platforms to establish and maintain minimum standards for an personal information security program to ensure the protection of children’s personal information; (iii) limiting the retention of children’s personal information to that which is reasonably necessary to provide the service for which the information was collected and prohibiting indefinite retention of such information; and (iv) expanding the scope of disclosures that covered websites and online platforms must make to the FTC and in notices to users, among other changes.

In parallel, private class action and multidistrict litigation remains an active and growing means by which private plaintiffs are testing theories of liability to hold major social media platforms liable for online harms, including, but not limited to, violations of state consumer protection statutes and theories of negligence, fraudulent concealment, and product defect (e.g., that social media platforms are “defective” because they are designed to maximize screen time, which can encourage addictive behavior and cause emotional and physical harm in young people). Plaintiffs are seeking civil damages and injunctive relief. Such litigation has the potential to shape the practices of major social media platforms even in the absence of comprehensive national online safety legislation in the United States.


Key contacts

Scott S. Balber photo

Scott S. Balber

Head of Litigation, US and Managing Partner, New York Office, New York

Christopher Boyd photo

Christopher Boyd

Senior Associate, New York

Stay in the know

Receive timely insights and briefings from HSF Kramer, tailored to keep you informed and ahead

Subscribe now
TMT disputes Technology, media and entertainment, and telecommunications Technology, Media and Telecoms Scott S. Balber Christopher Boyd