Corporate Governance snapshot: Preparing your annual report and for your AGM in 2026

This snapshot summarises the key developments and issues which have arisen over the last 12 months and which UK-incorporated listed companies should have on their radar when preparing their annual report to be published in 2026 and for their 2026 annual general meeting (AGM). It also considers the status of various ongoing reform programmes relating to shareholder engagement and corporate governance.
 

1. The annual report in 2026

For companies with a 31 December year-end, there are only minor changes which need to be reflected in the annual report and accounts (ARA) in 2026, notably the transition to reporting under the 2024 edition of the UK Corporate Governance Code (2024 Governance Code, or Code where any edition is being referred to) and the application of the increased financial thresholds for the classification of companies.

• The 2024 Governance Code
  
  In January 2024, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) published the 2024 Governance Code (see our snapshot here for a summary of the changes introduced by the FRC). The 2024 Governance Code applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2025, with the exception of Provision 29 on internal controls reporting (which applies from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2026). Accordingly, many companies will be reporting against the 2024 Governance Code for the first time in 2026.
  
  For the most part, the changes introduced by the FRC in the 2024 Governance Code are not substantial and so there will be relatively few amendments needed to reflect the transition to the new edition of the Code. Close attention to detail will be needed to ensure however that the changes introduced are correctly reflected. For example, reference should be made to how the desired culture has been "embedded" in addition to how the board has assessed and monitored culture. Also, with the introduction of new Principle C, as an overarching approach the reporting should focus on the outcomes of board decisions in the context of the company's strategy and objectives.
  
  The FRC's Audit Committee and the External Audit Minimum Standard (Minimum Standard), which was published in May 2023 and applied from that date to FTSE 350 companies, is now expressly referred to in the 2024 Governance Code and so applies to all companies applying the 2024 Governance Code. The Minimum Standard sets out certain disclosures on the work of the audit committee to be included in the annual report, in particular in relation to auditor independence and quality, and audit tenders, so companies should ensure that these disclosures are duly incorporated in their ARA.
  
  As noted above, more substantial reporting changes will be needed in 2027 to reflect Provision 29 of the 2024 Governance Code, which requires boards to include more fulsome disclosures on the monitoring and effectiveness of the company's material controls. Companies may wish to signpost their progress in relation to readiness to comply with Provision 29 next year and ensure that they have in place the necessary processes and procedures in place to make the more fulsome disclosures in due course in their ARA to be published in 2027.
   
• FRC guidance
  
  In November 2025, the FRC published its annual report of corporate governance reporting for 2025, which discusses the quality of reporting against the Code (see our blog post here). As noted above, the 2024 Governance Code applies to financial year beginning on or after 1 January 2025, so this report is the last in which the FRC will look at reporting against the 2018 edition of the Code. More than half the companies reviewed referred to the new Provision 29 in their annual report, with many including details on how they are preparing for it applying from financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2026.
  
  In September 2025, the FRC published its annual review of wider corporate reporting (see our blog post here). The review observed a continued quality gap between reporting by FTSE 350 companies and other companies (see below on the FRC's thematic review on reporting by smaller listed companies). For the second year in a row, climate-related reporting issues appeared in the top ten most common issues on which the FRC asked companies substantive questions, requiring further information or explanations to understand disclosures in their annual report.
  
  Other papers published by the FRC during 2025 include:
   
  • a thematic review of reporting by smaller listed companies which focused on the four areas in relation to which substantive letters are most commonly sent to smaller listed companies - namely revenue, cash flow statements, impairment of non-financial assets and financial instruments (see our blog post here);
  • a thematic review of climate-related disclosures by AIM and large private companies (ie those not within the UK Listing Rules (UKLRs) Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) reporting regime) (see our blog post here);
  • updated going concern guidance following the consultation it conducted on changes to the guidance in 2024 (see our blog post here); and
  • a review of structured digital reporting, with recommendations for companies on best practice (see our blog post here). On a related note, companies should ensure that any regulated information submitted for filing at the National Storage Mechanism (NSM) complies with the requirements introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in November 2025 to enhance the NSM, for example the need to include a company's LEI number on every RIS announcement (see our blog post here).
     
• Increased financial thresholds for company classification
  
  Under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), whether companies need to include certain disclosures in their annual report will depend in part on whether they meet certain size thresholds set out in the CA 2006. There are three criteria used when assessing a company's size for the purposes of these thresholds - turnover, balance sheet and the number of employees - and four different size classifications – micro-entity, small, medium or large. If a company satisfies two or more of the three criteria for a particular classification, then it will qualify for that classification.
  
  The financial criteria (ie, turnover and balance sheet) for each of the size classifications, other than "large", were increased with effect from 6 April 2025 and these revised thresholds apply when considering any previous financial year. The revised thresholds are summarised in the table below. As a result, companies may find that entities within their groups no longer fall within the remit of certain reporting requirements and should adjust the disclosures made accordingly.

*gross for parent companies
 

2. The AGM in 2026

There are no new resolutions which need to be put to shareholders at the AGM in 2026, nor are there any major developments which will impact on the preparation for, or running of, the 2026 AGM. There are however some issues which those involved in the company's AGM should be aware of:

• Updated proxy voting guidelines: The ISS, Pensions UK (formerly the PLSA) and Glass Lewis have all published updates to their proxy voting guidelines (see our blog posts here, here and here). The updated guidelines all include expanded commentary on virtual-only shareholder meetings, which should be kept in mind when details of the government's proposals to clarify the provisions of the CA 2006 relating to such meetings are published (see further below), as well as other issues including board diversity, board committee composition and cybersecurity.
   

• Pre-Emption Group Guidelines: the third annual monitoring report on the use of the revised November 2022 Pre-Emption Group's Statement of Principles (Principles) on the disapplication of pre-emption rights was published in November 2025. The review covered the adoption of the Principles by FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 companies at meetings held between 1 August 2024 and 31 July 2025. The key findings include:
   

  • 77.6% of FTSE 350 companies that put forward resolutions to disapply pre-emption rights sought ‘enhanced’ disapplication authorities as permitted under the Principles (an increase from 67.1% in 2024 and 55.7% in 2023) – enhanced authority refers to a disapplication request where either the request for general corporate purposes, or the request for a specified capital investment, or both, exceeds the 5% authority previously allowed under the 2015 Statement of Principles; and
  • 99.1% of the disapplication resolutions were passed, with 72.6% of disapplication resolutions for general corporate purposes passed with less than 5% of votes against.
     

  The findings suggest that the market has adapted to, and accepted companies taking advantage of, the enhanced disapplication authorities permitted under the Principles, though see the box below on the impact of the reforms to the UK prospectus regime with effect from 19 January 2026.
   

• Meeting format: As illustrated by the charts below, the format adopted by FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 companies for their AGMs remained broadly the same in 2025 as in previous years, though there was a small increase in digitally-enabled AGMs.
  
  Following the government's commitment in October 2024 to look at the legality of virtual-only shareholder meetings, it is not surprising that there has been increased attention and debate surrounding this type of meeting format. As noted above, the ISS, Glass Lewis and Pensions UK have all expressed their views on the appropriateness of virtual-only meetings and in December 2025, the GC100 published guidance for companies on this meeting format. It remains to be seen however what the government will propose, and what companies may need to do in order to take advantage of any changes made by the government. As a result, we would recommend that companies wait before proposing any amendments to their articles of association or making any changes to their AGM format.
   
• Removal of the Investment Association (IA) Public Register: In October 2025, the government announced that it had asked the IA to discontinue its online public register of significant votes (20% or more) cast against the resolutions of listed companies. There has however been no change to the 2024 Governance Code and companies will therefore still need to make the announcements required by Provision 4 of the 2024 Governance Code in the event that any board recommended resolution receives significant votes against.