Both common law and statute impose strict requirements around distributions by UK incorporated companies to their shareholders. These relate in particular to the prohibition on companies making distributions except out of profits that are available for the purpose – so– called distributable reserves – and the need to evidence these reserves. Full compliance with all aspects of the detailed rules is important, as even a minor technical error will render a distribution unlawful. Where a company pays an unlawful dividend, there are significant consequences. In particular:

  • the payment of an unlawful dividend is likely to be considered a breach of each director’s statutory and fiduciary duties, as well as a breach of the Companies Act 2006 (2006 Act);
  • each director is liable to repay to the company a dividend paid in contravention of the 2006 Act if they knew, or ought to have known, that the payments were unlawful;
  • each shareholder is obliged to repay the unlawful dividend if they knew, or had reasonable cause to believe, that the distribution was not made in accordance with the 2006 Act; and
  • even if they didn't know that the distribution was not made in accordance with the 2006 Act, at common law each shareholder holds the money received on trust for the company.

Any company that has made an unlawful distribution will therefore need a remediation strategy. Shareholders cannot ratify the failure to comply with the statutory capital maintenance rules, but steps can be taken to remedy the position. Depending on the circumstances, in the event of an inadvertent or technical breach of the requirements of the 2006 Act, this may involve:

  • drawing up interim accounts and filing them;
  • taking capital maintenance action to create the correct level of profits in the company making the distribution (eg carrying out a reduction of capital or paying dividends up the group chain); and
  • appropriating profits recorded in different accounting periods.

The company is also likely to enter into deeds of release with:

  • the recipient shareholders, to release them from any liability to repay amounts received; and
  • the directors, to waive any right to pursue any of the directors regarding the decision to make the distribution.

These steps will require shareholder approval. The deeds of release with the company’s directors and any substantial shareholders will also be related party transactions for the purposes of the UK Listing Rules or AIM Rules, as applicable, and so will need to comply with the requirements of the relevant rules.

The capital maintenance rules & distributable reserves

Under the 2006 Act, companies can only make distributions to their shareholders out of profits available for distribution – known as their distributable reserves. This is part of the capital maintenance rule which seeks to protect a company's creditors by preventing the erosion of the company's capital.

A company's profits available for distribution are defined in the 2006 Act as its accumulated, realised profits less its accumulated, realised losses.

Calculating a company's distributable reserves is more complicated that just looking at its latest P&L account and often will involve speaking to the company's accountants.

In practice 

Given the myriad of applicable requirements, unlawful distributions in the listed company arena are, perhaps not surprisingly, frequently due to an inadvertent technical error – the company has the funds available to make the distribution, it just fails to follow the strict procedural requirements to ensure that the company has complied with the 2006 Act.

Share buybacks 

Whilst share buybacks are not distributions for the purposes of the 2006 Act, they are subject to the same capital maintenance rules and can only be carried out using profits available for distributions. Accordingly the issues discussed in this bulletin in relation to the preparation of accounts to evidence the availability of these profits also apply when contemplating share buybacks.

Common mistakes include: 

  • The group has sufficient distributable reserves on a consolidated basis which are used to justify a dividend, but not at the level of the actual company paying the dividend;
  • Interim accounts are prepared to show distributable reserves at the correct company level but there is a failure to file those accounts at Companies House (filing of interim accounts is a requirement for plcs making a distribution (but not for private limited companies));
  • Not realising that, as well as dividends, distributions can also include, for instance, the transfer of tax losses for nil consideration or other intra-group transfers made at less than market value. 

If you would like to discuss any of the issues raised in this UK PLC Insight briefing, please contact our listed company team.


Key contacts

Gareth Sykes photo

Gareth Sykes

Partner, Head of Corporate Governance Advisory, UK, London

Stay in the know

Receive timely insights and briefings from HSF Kramer, tailored to keep you informed and ahead

Subscribe now
London UK listed companies Corporate Robert Moore Caroline Rae Gareth Sykes