Stay in the know
Receive timely insights and briefings from HSF Kramer, tailored to keep you informed and ahead
The privatisation of Dongfeng Motor Group is not your typical Hong Kong take-private. By combining a delisting with a simultaneous spin-off and listing of its high-growth electric vehicle subsidiary, Voyah, Dongfeng has created a structure that we believe will define the next generation of public M&A in the region.
Dongfeng Motor Group was taken private through a merger by absorption under PRC law,
with Dongfeng Motor Group (Wuhan) Investment Company Limited (the offeror) absorbing the listed entity. Minority H shareholders received a cash cancellation price of HK$6.68 per share, while controlling shareholders receive consideration through equity in the absorbing vehicle. Merger by absorption enables the offeror to take 100% ownership of the listed entity absent the availability of squeeze-out and scheme of arrangement under PRC Company Law.
What distinguishes this transaction from conventional Hong Kong privatisations is its integration with a pre-completion distribution and concurrent listing. At the same time, Dongfeng distributed approximately 79.7% of its stake in Voyah to existing shareholders on a pro rata basis, followed by a listing by introduction of Voyah on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The result: shareholders received both cash for the privatisation and direct exposure to Voyah as a newly listed standalone company.
This dual-track structure addresses a common challenge in take-privates: reconciling divergent shareholder expectations between near-term liquidity and long-term growth participation.
By separating the mature legacy business from the high-growth electric vehicle segment, Dongfeng effectively unlocks the conglomerate discount while preserving investor access to upside. The implied aggregate value delivered – comprising both the cash cancellation price and the in-specie distribution of Voyah shares, and illustrates how transaction engineering can bridge valuation gaps.
The legal architecture here is deliberate and worth understanding. The inter-conditionality of the privatisation, distribution and listing is particularly noteworthy. Each component is dependent on the others, requiring careful coordination of regulatory approvals, shareholder votes and execution timelines across Hong Kong and the PRC. Voyah's listing uses a listing by introduction rather than a traditional IPO, which further enhances execution certainty while avoiding primary capital raising at the spin-off stage.
This deal reflects broader trends in strategic restructurings among state-owned enterprises, where capital markets are increasingly used to sharpen business focus and optimise valuation. By privatising the legacy platform while simultaneously creating a new listed growth vehicle, Dongfeng is effectively undertaking a “de-list and re-list” transformation within a single, integrated framework.
From Dongfeng and Voyah’s perspective, the transaction helped accelerate Dongfeng’s international transformation. With the listing also allowing VOYAH, which is in its critical phase of development, to diversify its financing access, expand its overseas business presence, and strengthen its market influence.
This deal is likely to serve as an important precedent in Hong Kong. It demonstrates how privatisations can be paired with spin-offs to deliver differentiated outcomes for shareholders, and how cross-border legal tools can be deployed creatively in public M&A.
As valuation dislocations persist across sectors, similar hybrid structures may become an increasingly attractive option for listed groups seeking to unlock value.
HSF Kramer acted as legal adviser to China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, which acted as sole sponsor on the listing of VOYAH and as financial adviser on the privatisation. Partners Jason Sung and Jeremy Shen led a team advising on the privatisation, while Jason Sung and Jin Kong led a team advising on the listing of VOYAH.
The contents of this publication are for reference purposes only and may not be current as at the date of accessing this publication. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action based on this publication.
© Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer 2026
Receive timely insights and briefings from HSF Kramer, tailored to keep you informed and ahead