Last week the FCA published its rather grandly titled Call for Input on "Future regulation of alternative fund managers".
In summary, it foreshadows only a modest set of changes. It does not signal an ambitious break from the UK from the EU derived regulations governing alternative asset managers, borne out of 2011's Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD"), but rather, in the FCA's own words, it is simply "retaining – but substantially improving – the existing regime". Indeed, large asset managers "would be subject to a regime like the current rules for full-scope UK AIFMs".
Admittedly, however, the Call for Input is expressly preliminary in nature and limited in scope. The FCA does not consider much of the substance of the rules to which managers are presently subject (e.g. on remuneration, reporting and their prudential position), deferring that work to a later consultation.
There is intended to be a full Consultation Paper in the first half of 2026. We will therefore have to wait to see if the FCA has any bolder ambitions for the regulation of the sector.
Its focus in the Call for Input is primarily on who is within scope of asset management regulation and to what extent.
We discuss the Call for Input in more detail here.
Key contacts
Jonathan Blake
Head of International Private Funds Strategy, London
Nish Dissanayake
Partner, London
Nigel Farr
Partner, London
Shantanu Naravane
Partner, London
Stephen Newby
Partner, London
Krishna Shorewala
Partner, London
Tim West
Partner, London
Zoe Wilson
Senior Associate, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.