This is the 34th episode of our series of commercial litigation update podcasts. In this episode we discuss the upcoming pilot on public access to court documents, the new disclosure survey, and some important decisions on service of proceedings, termination of contracts, contractual interpretation and conditions precedent. This episode is hosted by Maura McIntosh, a knowledge counsel in our commercial litigation team, who is joined by James Farrell, a disputes partner, and Chris Cox, a senior associate in our disputes team.
Our podcast is available on iTunes, Spotify and SoundCloud and can be accessed on all devices. A new episode is released every couple of months. You can subscribe and be notified of all future episodes.
Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast.
- UK Commercial Court pilot will mean many more court documents publicly available by default from 1 January 2026
- Disclosure Review Working Group seeks views on disclosure under PD 57AD
- Court of Appeal confirms defendant not required to take any steps in proceedings unless claim form validly served in time
- Court of Appeal confirms party cannot waive contractual right to terminate unless it is actually aware of the right
- Court of Appeal finds loss of bargain damages were available on termination for non-repudiatory breach of contract under express contractual provision
- Court of Appeal overturns High Court’s interpretation of deferred consideration clause
- Supreme Court finds there is no principle in English law that a condition precedent to payment of a debt will be deemed fulfilled if fulfilment was prevented by a party's own breach
A transcript of this podcast is available here.
Key contacts
Maura McIntosh
Knowledge Counsel, London
James Farrell
Partner, London
Christopher Cox
Partner, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.