The ICC's revised set of Arbitration Rules came into effect on 1 January 2012. The new Rules codify existing practice in several areas, but also add a number of provisions intended to address the growing complexity of today's disputes, the particular features of disputes involving states and state owned entities, and demands for greater speed and cost-efficiency.
The webinar discussed the main innovations in the new Rules and the issues which should be borne in mind at the contract negotiation stage if the ICC Rules are being considered to resolve disputes.
The following topics were considered in particular:
- new provisions relating to complex multi-party, multi-contract disputes;
- the new 'opt-out' Emergency Arbitrator procedure for urgent interim or conservatory measures;
- incentives for arbitrators and parties to conduct proceedings efficiently and cost-effectively; and
- the lack of a general obligation of confidentiality.
If you would like to receive details of upcoming webinar or receive an audible download of the above webinar please contact Prudence Heidemans.
Key contacts
Simon Chapman KC
Managing Partner, Disputes, Asia and Australia, Hong Kong and Korea Group
Andrew Cannon
Partner, Head of International Arbitration, London, Paris, India Group, Nordic Group, Africa Group, Kazakhstan Group, Ukraine Group and Central Asia Group
Dr Patricia Nacimiento
Partner, Germany, Central Asia Group, Kazakhstan Group, Latin America Group and Ukraine Group
Kathryn Sanger
Partner, Head of Disputes, China and Japan and Head of Private Capital, Asia, Hong Kong
Thierry Tomasi
Partner, Paris, Latin America Group and Africa Group
Christian Leathley
Partner, Head of International Arbitration, US, London, New York and Latin America Group
Craig Tevendale
Partner, Head of Energy, UK, London, Africa Group, Central Asia Group and Kazakhstan Group
Gitta Satryani
Managing Partner, Singapore Office, Singapore
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.