Whilst much has been said about some of the changes which have been proposed in the ongoing reform of the regulatory regime applicable to the UK financial services industry, the full ramifications of some of the new provisions have received less attention than they deserve. The (presumably) unintended consequences of two of the proposals – the FCA's new power to publish information about enforcement action at an earlier stage and the reversed burden of proof for "Senior Managers" – may well include shifting the emphasis of firms away from typically settling regulatory enforcement actions and in favour of taking a more adversarial approach to challenging the regulator's conclusions.
In an article first published by Hart Publishing as Thomas and Edwards, "Is it time for firms to reconsider their approach to settling enforcement action?" (2013) 7 LFMR 301, reproduced by agreement with the publishers, senior associates Sarah Thomas and Harry Edwards explain why regulatory reform may well have such an impact on firms' approach to settling the major enforcement actions which they face.
Click here to read the article.
Key contacts
Karen Anderson
Consultant, London
Susannah Cogman
Partner, London
Elizabeth Head
Of Counsel, London
Marina Reason
Partner, London
Kelesi Blundell
Partner, London
Hywel Jenkins
Partner, London
Chris Ninan
Partner, London
Jon Ford
Partner, London
Clive Cunningham
Consultant, London
Chee Hian Kwah
Director, Prolegis LLC, Singapore
Valerie Tao
Knowledge Lawyer, Hong Kong
Cat Dankos
Senior Regulatory Consultant, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.