Last Friday, the SFC issued supplemental consultation conclusions covering prospectus liability for sponsors. The SFC has concluded that sponsors already have potential civil and criminal liability for prospectuses under the current legislation and therefore no legislative amendments are required. The supplemental consultation conclusions published last Friday send a message to the market that the SFC considers sponsors are already caught by the existing regime and it will consider bringing criminal proceedings against sponsors in appropriate circumstances where material untrue statements are made in a prospectus.
However, the SFC has also indicated that certain proposed amendments to address potential shortfalls in the existing regulatory regime identified in the 2012 consultation conclusions will not be further considered. These relate to the liability of individual employees of sponsors and the burden of proof in any enforcement action. To read the briefing prepared by our team in Hong Kong, click here.
Key contacts
Karen Anderson
Consultant, London
Susannah Cogman
Partner, London
Elizabeth Head
Of Counsel, London
Clive Cunningham
Consultant, London
Marina Reason
Partner, London
Kelesi Blundell
Partner, London
Hywel Jenkins
Partner, London
Chris Ninan
Partner, London
Jon Ford
Partner, London
Simone Hui
Of Counsel, Hong Kong
Chee Hian Kwah
Director, Prolegis LLC, Singapore
Valerie Tao
Knowledge Lawyer, Hong Kong
Cat Dankos
Senior Regulatory Consultant, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.