The one-stop-shop for European patent litigation, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) celebrated its two year anniversary on 1 June 2025. Now in its third year of operation, we look at the themes, trends and practices that are developing in this new forum in our latest UPC briefing The UPC – Two years on.
The so called "long arm jurisdiction" of the UPC is certainly one of those themes, with the recent of the Mannheim LD in Fujifilm v Kodak (CFI 365/2023, 18 July 2025) in which the court awarded an injunction over infringement in the UK (relating to the UK designation of an EP bundle) illustrating the UPC's tendency to take jurisdiction wherever possible.
We also review other specific developments in the 6 months since our last UPC briefing (The UPC at 18 months - available via links within the current one) including the UPC's first decision involving a second medical use patent and the approach it has taken to such patents, and an analysis of the multiple SEPs-based disputes (including the use of anti-anti-suit injunctions) and the implications for FRAND determinations, as well as a round-up of other developments including on:
- Jurisdiction over pre-UPC infringements and damages and the applicable law, and the impact of opt-out (and its withdrawal)
- Criteria for PIs
- Claim interpretation and the UPC's doctrine of equivalence
- Determining imminent infringement
- Novelty – the “legal standard”; Inventive step/Obviousness; Added matter
- Stays and suspensive effect
- Security
- Access to pleadings
Key contacts
Sebastian Moore
Partner, Head Intellectual Property, London and Milan
Emily Bottle
Partner, London and Milan
Peter Dalton
Partner, London
Dr Ina vom Feld
Partner, Germany
Pietro Pouché
Partner, Milan
Andrew Moir
Partner, Intellectual Property and Head of Cyber Security and Data, London
Laura Orlando
Managing Partner, Milan Office, Milan
Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky
Partner, Germany
Jonathan Turnbull
Partner, London
Andrew Wells
Partner, London
Rachel Montagnon
Knowledge Counsel, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.