This is the first episode of "Cross-examining AI", HSF Kramer's podcast series on disputes and AI, where we unpack the key developments in AI that are shaping litigation today. In this episode we discuss the Civil Justice Council’s interim report and consultation on the use of AI in preparing court documents and give an overview of the first cases to consider the impact of AI on privilege. This episode is hosted by Martin Hevey, a senior associate in our disputes team, who is joined by Emma Deas, a banking litigation partner, and Charlotte Benton, a senior associate in our disputes team.
Our podcast is available on iTunes, Spotify and SoundCloud and can be accessed on all devices. A new episode is released every couple of months. You can subscribe and be notified of all future episodes.
Below you can find links to our blog posts on the developments and cases covered in this podcast.
- Civil Justice Council publishes consultation on use of AI for preparing court documents
- New York court finds client chats with generative AI tool Claude are not privileged
- Upper Tribunal observes that uploading confidential documents into open-source AI tools waives client confidentiality and legal privilege
- Navigating legal privilege issues when using AI
Key contacts
Martin Hevey
Senior Associate, London
Emma Deas
Partner, London
Charlotte Benton
Senior Associate, London
Camilla Macpherson
Knowledge Lawyer, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.