Litigation Notes

High Court refuses to admit late witness evidence, applying principles for applications for relief from sanctions

In a recent decision, the High Court held that an application to admit witness evidence which had been filed and served late should be treated like an …

High Court rejects claim to litigation privilege in advice from accountants on tax structure

In a recent decision, the High Court has held that advice from accountants on a proposed new tax structure was not prepared for the dominant purpose of …

Commercial litigation podcast series – Episode 4: General update

When events intervene: Force majeure, frustration and material adverse change

Commercial Court considers contractual estoppel, entire agreement clauses and declaratory relief in dispute relating to 1992 ISDA Master Agreement

The Commercial Court has granted declaratory relief concerning a bank’s rights under an interest rate hedging arrangement governed by the 1992 ISDA …

Article published - Disclosure Pilot Scheme: a potential way forward?

Privy Council clarifies application of Duomatic principle to beneficial owners and the conferring of ostensible authority

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has ruled that the corporate director and the agent of a BVI-based holding company did not owe the company a …

Court of Appeal upholds High Court’s decision on the preferred contractual construction of a term in an exclusion clause

The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court’s decision on a claim involving the legal meaning of ‘goodwill’ and the contractual construction of an …

High Court says bank need not comply with numerous and repetitive DSARs which were being used for a collateral purpose

The High Court has dismissed a Part 8 claim against a bank for allegedly failing to provide an adequate response to the claimant’s Data Subject Access …

Judicial Update on operation of the Disclosure Pilot Scheme

Claimant’s offer construed to comply with CPR Part 36 despite error in specifying minimum 21-day “relevant period” for the offer

The High Court has construed a claimant’s offer as compliant with CPR Part 36 where it stated that the “relevant period” ran for 21 days from the date of …

High Court decision suggests damages may be calculated differently where claimant is hopelessly insolvent

In a recent decision, the High Court declined to strike out a claim against a bank for alleged breach of a Quincecare duty on the ground that the …