Daniel L. Geyser

He handles complex and high-stakes appellate litigation, representing clients in the Supreme Court of the United States and appellate courts nationwide.

In the past five terms alone, Dan has had six cert. petitions granted, argued eight SCOTUS merits cases, and secured multiple wins in high-stakes disputes. He is a two-time Law360 Appellate MVP (an honor awarded to only four lawyers in the United States) and was recently named one of 12 lawyers who are “the Future of the Supreme Court Bar” (Law360, December 2024).

Dan is widely regarded as one of the nation’s leading Supreme Court and appellate lawyers. The Legal 500 reports that Dan is “recognized by peers and clients alike as ‘an extraordinary oral advocate and brief writer,’” “stand[ing] out for his sheer brainpower and creative thinking”; clients say “Geyser’s intellect and analysis are peerless”; “‘[h]is legal analysis is brilliant and on point, and his written and oral advocacy is very strong and powerful’”; “‘[he] is the best.’” Chambers USA describes Dan as “‘a game-changer,’” “‘an incredible talent,’” and “‘the smartest guy in the room,’” whose work is “‘impressive,’” “‘phenomenal,’” “‘fabulous,’” and “‘brilliant’”; he is recognized as a “‘superb lawyer with impeccable judgment and a wonderful manner in oral arguments,’” and he has “‘that rare ability to make clients and legal counsel at ease, even under difficult circumstances. He instills confidence.’”

Dan is among a select group of lawyers who regularly handle significant disputes in the US Supreme Court. Listed among the “veritable who’s who of the Supreme Court bar” (Empirical SCOTUS), Dan has argued 19 Supreme Court cases in private practice, including two arguments last term. He has twice had three cert. petitions granted in a 12-month period (a feat matched by few global firms) and personally handled over 5% of the Court’s merits docket in OT 2018. He has been named to the National Law Journal’s Appellate Hot List, earned weekly honors as a Law360 Legal Lion, achieved national appellate rankings in Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and Lawdragon, and been declared OT 2017’s “top performing” brief writer (based on a 2018 empirical study using brief-analyzing software). His petitions are regularly selected as Featured Petitions on SCOTUSblog, and he is a three-time winner of NAAG’s Best Brief Award for excellence in brief writing before the Court. Since 2017, Dan has had the third-highest SCOTUS grant rate in the country among all repeat players in private practice, per an analysis “show[ing] how a small circle of elite Supreme Court advocates” can “significantly shift the odds” (Legalytics, The Supreme Court’s Quiet Power Players). And in the past half-decade, Dan ranks among the top 10 lawyers nationwide for total Supreme Court arguments in private practice, notching “rare victor[ies]” (SCOTUSblog) and “huge win[s]” (Reuters) in cases that industry experts said could not be won.

Dan routinely matches up against the top litigators in the country. He has convinced the Supreme Court to grant review over the opposition of elite appellate groups at multiple Am Law 20 firms, and his recent wins have come against superstars at Am Law 10 firms and the Solicitor General’s Office. In the past five terms alone, Dan has secured multiple wins in major business disputes—including striking down an act of Congress under the Bankruptcy Clause, winning a closely watched battle for taxpayers under the Bank Secrecy Act, reshaping arbitration rules nationwide under the Federal Arbitration Act (three times in separate cases), and arguing a multibillion-dollar dispute under the False Claims Act, one of Dan’s three cert. grants in 2022.

Beyond the Supreme Court, Dan handles high-stakes matters in appellate courts nationwide, litigating cases in virtually every major area of federal law (especially bankruptcy, securities, patents, ERISA, and arbitration). For plaintiffs, he has crafted legal strategy in matters generating over a half-billion dollars in recovery. For defendants, he has won appeals in eight- and nine-figure disputes. He has significant experience at the rehearing stage and has argued before the en banc Ninth Circuit (winning 10-1). In addition to an active federal practice, Dan handles landmark state-court appeals, including arguing seven times before the Texas Supreme Court.

Before joining the firm, Dan ran his own award-winning appellate practice; served as the appellate chair of a prominent litigation boutique (also leading that firm to the National Law Journal’s Appellate Hot List and a Chambers USA national-appellate ranking); and was an appellate partner in one of the nation’s top litigation firms, building its appellate practice while focusing especially on complex patent appeals and bankruptcy cases.

From 2007 to 2011, Dan served in the Office of the Solicitor General of Texas, where he conducted and supervised appellate litigation for the State. In addition to handling his own docket, his experience in the office included advising other divisions on appellate and trial strategy, revising countless briefs in cases across all subject areas, and extensively preparing other attorneys (in moot courts and otherwise) for oral argument. In his last week on the job, Dan argued before the Texas Supreme Court in Severance v. Patterson, one of the State’s most important cases in recent memory—a constitutional attack on the public’s historic access to open beaches; he had earlier won “a rare motion to rehear the case” (Austin American-Statesman). The same week, Dan also won a major case in the US Supreme Court, Sossamon v. Texas, involving Congress’s spending power and state sovereignty; Dan wrote the State’s briefs in that case and crafted its core legal theories and appellate strategy. He was also the principal writer of the State’s invitation brief in Rhine v. Deaton, a case marking the very first time the US Supreme Court called for a state solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of a State.

Dan graduated Phi Beta Kappa, with honors and distinction, from Stanford University, and with honors from Harvard Law School, where he was the Notes Chair of the Harvard Law Review, a best-brief winner and oralist on the championship team of Harvard’s moot court competition, and a research assistant to Professor Laurence H. Tribe, working on his academic writing and appellate docket. After law school, Dan clerked for the Hon. Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dan is an invite-only member of BriefCatch’s Legal Writing Advisory Panel and a mentor in multiple programs promoting diversity and inclusion in the legal profession. He has received the State Bar of California’s Wiley W. Manuel Award for Pro Bono Legal Services and is a past appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Pro Bono Panel.

Dan Geyser is admitted to the bar in both Texas and California and is not a member of the District of Columbia Bar. His DC practice is supervised by members of the DC Bar, pending his DC Bar application.