In the recent decision of UAB Business Enterprise v Oneta Ltd [2026] EWHC 543 (Ch), the High Court rejected a witness's evidence in its entirety, finding that he had been assisted or coached while giving evidence through smart glasses that were connected to his phone. The case provides a cautionary reminder of the prohibition on witness coaching and the importance of compliance with procedural rules when preparing witness statements, both of which can significantly affect a witness’s credibility if not handled correctly.
Chris Bushell and Tracey Lattimer have published an article in the April 2026 issue of PLC Magazine which considers this case and its practical implications.
This article first appeared in the April 2026 issue of PLC Magazine: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Resources/PLCMagazine
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.