On 27 November 2025, MHCLG and the Mayor of London launched two consultations on four measures of a proposed emergency package to support housebuilding in London. These consultations close on 22 January 2025.
- The first consultation is the "London Emergency Housing Package Consultation" by MHCLG (see here). This proposes:
- a new temporary Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) relief; and
- extended referral and call-in powers for the Mayor of London.
- The second consultation is "Support for Housebuilding – Draft LPG consultation, November 2025" by the Mayor of London (see here). This covers:
- a new time-limited planning route; and
- temporary changes to cycle parking, dual aspect and dwellings per core aspects of London Plan Guidance.
The fifth measure of the emergency package is a new City Hall Developer Investment Fund, to which the government proposes allocating an initial £322 million from 2026-27 to enable the Mayor to further support housebuilding. The terms of this programme are being established between the Greater London Authority (GLA) and MHCLG. We await further details, including information on how to apply for funding and how funding decisions will be made.
What do we think of the consultation proposals? It is encouraging to see clear acknowledgement of the challenges facing developers seeking to deliver housing in London. However, whilst temporary measures like potential CIL relief are to be welcomed, and the introduction of a time-limited planning route offers the promise of support, schemes will only be able to access them where they can commit to delivering the first 10% of homes as affordable homes without grant. They must go on to provide at least 20% of homes as affordable, and to do so in a limited timeframe. In the current market, few schemes will actually find that percentage hurdle achievable, particularly for schemes that really have the potential to shift the dial on housing delivery. Further, many developers may still point to an underlying lack of market demand also posing a challenge to scheme delivery. This makes an expectation that schemes build out promptly or face claw back proposals a commercial risk that they will need to grapple with.
Developers should take this opportunity to shape the technical detail of the proposals by responding to the consultations with views, supported by evidence, of whether they will make the difference that the government and the GLA are hoping to achieve, and also whether they are likely to take-up the new routes to permission and the new CIL relief or continue to rely on existing routes and reliefs.
To help our clients decide whether and how to respond, we have prepared a detailed summary and analysis of the consultation proposals. If you would be interested in receiving a copy, please contact us using the details below.
Key contacts
Matthew White
Managing Partner, Real Estate, UK and EMEA, London
Ben Hazenberg
Senior Associate, London
Sam Burstall
Senior Associate, London
Naomi Hoggett
Associate, London
Fiona Sawyer
Knowledge Lawyer, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.