Find a lawyer
Let’s connect
By Shaun McVicar, Steve Wong and Sarah Henkes-Younger
The Full Federal Court has ruled that only a natural person can be an inventor under the Patents Act 1990.
In July 2021, a single judge of the Federal Court ruled that an artificial intelligence system can be an ‘inventor’ for the purposes of the Patents Act (see our earlier article on this decision here). In a unanimous decision of a five-judge appeal panel, the Full Federal Court has overturned the decision. This case also raises important questions about the respective roles of the Court and the legislature in modernising the patent landscape in response to novel technologies such as AI.
Key contacts
Rebekah Gay
Partner, Head of Intellectual Property, Sydney
Laura Orlando
Managing Partner, Milan Office, Milan
Sue Gilchrist
Consultant, Sydney
雷鹏
科伟史密夫斐尔凯迈联营办公室合伙人, Mainland China and Shanghai
Alexandra Neri
Partner, Paris
Dr Ina vom Feld
Partner, Germany
Sebastian Moore
Partner, Head Intellectual Property, London and Milan
Rachel Montagnon
Knowledge Counsel, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.