Singapore does not currently have a dedicated artificial intelligence regulation. It relies on sectoral guidance from ministries, authorities, and commissions that publish guidelines and regulations, including the AI Verify Foundation, Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA), Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), Advisory Council on the Ethical Use of AI and Data, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore, Ministry of Health – as well as case law from the Singapore courts.

AI Strategy

The Singapore National AI Strategy was first published in 2019 and updated in 2023. It emphasises the country's commitment to a responsible AI ecosystem that fosters innovation and growth. Its main focus is to maintain an agile regulatory approach to support AI experimentation whilst providing legal compliance and safeguards.

Established in 2018 and chaired by the Minister for Communications and Information, the Advisory Council on the Ethical Use of AI and Data, issues high-level advice on ethical, policy and governance issues in data-driven technologies.

In February 2026, the Singapore government's Economic Strategy Review recommended establishing Singapore as a global AI leader by supporting AI adoption and positioning Singapore as a place to develop, test, deploy and scale impactful AI solutions. 

The government also announced in its Budget that it would chair a new National AI Council to drive its strategic direction for AI. The Council would focus on four key sectors, advanced manufacturing, connectivity, finance and healthcare, to bolster AI adoption and deployment. 

Toolkits and Frameworks

  • IMDA and PDPC's Model AI Governance Framework issued in January 2020 on ethical and governance practices for “analytical AI”, covering explainability, data accountability and transparency. The second edition adds robustness and reproducibility considerations.
  • In May 2024, the AI Verify Foundation and IMDA expanded the Model Framework to address specific concerns around generative AI, such as prompt-engineering risks, hallucinations and watermarking strategies, while fostering innovation.
  • Developed by IMDA, the AI Verify toolkit supports organisations in testing AI systems against OECD, EU and national principles. It generates standardised test reports to promote transparency with regulators and stakeholders.
  • In October 2025, the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore released Securing Agentic AI – An Addendum to the Guidelines and Companion Guide on Securing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems for public consultation. 
  • In January 2026, IMDA unveiled its agentic AI governance framework to guide safe deployment. The framework emphasises both technical and non-technical controls to ensure that organisations maintain accountability and manage new operational risks posed by AI agents.

Helpful resources

Currently, there is no AI-specific regulation or legislation in place in Singapore.

From consumer protection law to online safety, AI continues to stretch existing legal frameworks. See the latest updates below.

The principal data protection regime is the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA). The regime requires organisations to process personal data in compliance with principles of fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, minimisation, accuracy, accountability, storage and security, among others.

  • In March 2024, the Personal Data Protection Commission issued Advisory Guidelines on use of Personal Data in AI Recommendation and Decision Systems. The guidelines provide organisations with more clarity on the use of personal data to train or develop AI to support their efforts to implement AI. In particular, they provide guidance on information to be provided to consumers when seeking consent, guidance to third-party developers of bespoke AI Systems who may occupy the role of data intermediaries on their obligations under the PDPA, and guidance on best practices to support businesses in their compliance with the PDPA.
  • In July 2025, IMDA released an adoption guide for privacy enhancing technologies and a Singapore Standard for Data Protection.

Helpful resources

The National AI Strategy from 2019 and version 2.0 in 2023 included several actions, outlined below, to ensure Singapore's intellectual property regulatory regime supports the development and commercialisation of AI technologies.

Copyright

  • During the November 2021 revision of the Singapore Copyright Act, a key change was introduced to provide a permissive exception to copyright infringement for text and data mining that applies to both commercial and non-commercial parties. This amendment facilitates the availability of data for the purposes of AI model development.

Patents

  • The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) has previously launched initiatives aimed at AI patents, including the Accelerated Initiative for Artificial Intelligence in 2019, which was introduced to speed up the patent application process for AI inventions. This initiative was replaced by a new patent acceleration programme (SG Patents Fast) on 20 May 2025. Separately, IPOS issued Supplemental Guidance for the Examination of AI-related Patent Applications in October 2024, which provides additional guidance on the patentability of AI-related inventions using hypothetical examples. IPOS has also contributed to several reports on AI and IP including:
    • A study on key stakeholders' perceptions of the AI and IP regulatory regime in Singapore which will contribute to Singapore's IP Strategy 2030, commissioned by IPOS and the Info-communications Media Development Authority and published in August 2022 by the Singapore Management University Centre for AI & Data Governance.
    • A February 2024 report by IPOS and the Singapore Management University Centre for AI & Data Governance, providing insights on the global AI landscape and approaches taken in different jurisdictions on AI and IP issues.

Employers must comply with the Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices, which promotes fair and merit-based employment practices.

  • If the use of AI tools results in discriminatory employment practices, workers or job applicants can approach the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) - Singapore's fair employment watchdog - for assistance.
  • The upcoming Workplace Fairness Legislation provides employees with further protection against workplace discrimination and is intended to come into effect sometime in 2026 or 2027.
  • The Ministry of Manpower is also closely monitoring trends in AI adoption, including the use of human resource tools powered by AI – for example, automated employment decision tools for candidate sourcing and screening, onboarding and offboarding, performance reviews, or compensation planning – to regularly assess and ensure that existing guidelines and regulations remain adequate to protect the workforce.

Competition and consumer protection

  • The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) - the principal competition and consumer protection authority in Singapore - noted in its 2023/2024 Annual Report that AI is impacting the work of competition regulators globally, including the CCCS. It has been studying and monitoring potential AI issues for some time, and has acknowledged that the use of AI systems and pricing algorithms amongst competitors might increase the risk of collusion between them (for example, through price fixing and allowing for the coordination of pricing strategies through real-time data monitoring).
  • The CCCS, according to its Annual Report, has been studying and monitoring potential AI issues for some time and has acknowledged that the use of AI systems and pricing algorithms amongst competitors might increase the risk of collusion between them.
  • It has conducted a market study on e-commerce platforms in 2020, where it noted that the use of AI or algorithms to support or facilitate any pre-existing or intended anti-competitive agreement or concerted practices will likely infringe section 34 of the Competition Act 2004.
  • The CCCS set up a Data & Digital division in 2023 to monitor regulatory developments in competition and consumer protection within digital markets, including AI. The division recommends necessary follow-up actions to be undertaken by the CCCS, such as digital market investigations and market studies.
  • The CCCS has also developed their own AI tools and systems to improve their enforcement capabilities.
  • A Bill proposing amendments to the Penal Code, received its second reading in November 2025. The Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill proposes increasing the penalties for the misuse of AI, including criminalising the use of generative AI to produce intimate images without consent and the generation of child abuse materials.

Investment

The Significant Investments Review Act came into force on 28 March 2024.

  • This Act, administered by the Office of Significant Investments Review under the Ministry of Trade and Industry, establishes a new investment review regime that includes ownership and control provisions for entities deemed critical to Singapore’s national security interests.
  • It complements existing sectoral legislation and authorises the Minister to review ownership or control transactions involving any entity that has acted against Singapore’s national security interests within two years after the transaction.
  • Designated entities are also required to notify and obtain approval from the Office of Significant Investments Review before proceeding with any transaction that meets certain thresholds.

 Financial services

  • In line with the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS) focus on the responsible use of AI, on 31 May 2023 MAS and Google Cloud signed a Memorandum of Understanding to collaborate on generative AI solutions grounded on responsible AI practices.
  • On 26 June 2023, MAS announced the release of the Veritas Toolkit version 2.0, an open-source toolkit to enable the responsible use of AI in the financial industry by helping financial institutions to carry out the assessment methodologies for the Fairness, Ethics, Accountability and Transparency (FEAT) principles. The FEAT principles provide guidance to firms offering financial products and services on the responsible use of AI and data analytics. 
  • In July 2024, MAS published an information paper on Cyber Risks Associated with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), which aims to raise financial institutions’ awareness by providing an overview of key cyber threats arising from generative AI, risk implications, and certain mitigations that financial institutions might take to address those risks.
  • In December 2024, MAS issued the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Model Risk Management to set out good practices for AI (including generative AI) model risk management, focusing on those related to governance and oversight, key risk management systems and processes, and development and deployment of AI. MAS encourages financial institutions to refer to these practices when they develop or deploy AI.
  • In November 2025 MAS issued a consultation paper proposing a set of guidelines on AI Risk Management. These guidelines would eventually apply to all financial institutions and aims to document MAS' expectations for (i) the oversight of AI risk management; (ii) key AI risk management systems, policies and procedures; and (iii) AI life cycle controls, capabilities, and capacities. 
  • In March 2026, MAS released an extensive AI Risk Management Toolkit, developed through collaboration with leading banks, insurers and asset managers under Project MindForge. The toolkit offers practical guidance on addressing risks related to traditional, generative and agentic AI technologies to support responsible AI deployment industry-wide.

Helpful resources

  • MAS information paper on AI risk management
  • ABS handbook on generative AI guardrails in banking

Healthcare

  • In October 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) published the Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Guidelines to support patient safety and improve trust in the use of AI in healthcare. The guidelines provide recommendations to encourage the safe development and implementation of AI medical devices, as well as any other AI use cases implemented in healthcare.
  • In March 2026, the MoH published the Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Guidelines version 2, applicable to healthcare AI developers, deployers and users, complementing existing legislation. The guidelines were updated with the aim to address the new challenges that have emerged in the healthcare sector due to the advancement in AI capabilities.

Key contacts

Kenji Lee photo

Kenji Lee

Associate, Prolegis LLC, Singapore

Clare Hubert photo

Clare Hubert

Senior Associate (Australia), Singapore

Victor Chiew photo

Victor Chiew

Director, Prolegis LLC, Singapore

Carrisa Low photo

Carrisa Low

Associate, Prolegis LLC, Singapore

Stay in the know

We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs

Subscribe now
Sydney Perth Brisbane Melbourne Technology, media and entertainment, and telecommunications Emerging technology Artificial intelligence Technology Artificial Intelligence Tech Regulation Digital Transformation Emerging Technologies AI and Emerging Technologies Kenji Lee Clare Hubert Victor Chiew Carrisa Low