It is lawful for employers to adopt a reasonable policy of refusing overtime to employees who have not opted out of the 48 hour maximum working week. This is not unlawful detriment on the ground of refusing to sign an opt out, according to a recent EAT decision.
The reason for refusing the overtime was to enforce a reasonable policy aimed at complying with working time law, and not because of the claimant's refusal to sign the opt out.
The EAT was bound by the tribunal's finding that the employer's policy was reasonable. It is perhaps this element of the decision which might not be followed in future cases, given that in practice the claimant's hours were nowhere near the working time limit. The assumed reasonableness of the policy was a critical part of the EAT's reasoning. (Arriva London South v Nicolaou, EAT).
Key contacts
Samantha Brown
Managing Partner, Employment, Pensions and Incentives, UK and EMEA, London
Steve Bell
Managing Partner, Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety, Asia and Australia, Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Partner, Head of Employment, Pensions and Incentives, EMEA, Paris
Tim Leaver
Partner, London
Andrew Taggart
Partner, London
Fatim Jumabhoy
Partner, Head of Employment & Workplace Investigations, Asia, Singapore
Barbara Roth
Partner, New York
Christine Young
Partner, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.