The recast Brussels Regulation introduced significant changes to the EU rules on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments for proceedings from 10 January 2015. One change of particular importance in the employment law sphere is that an employer domiciled outside the EU can now be sued by an employee in the courts of the EU member state where (or from where) the employee habitually works (or, if none, the member state where the business which engaged the employee is situated).
This contrasts with the position under the original Brussels Regulation, where the employer could only be sued in a member state court if it had a branch, agency or other establishment there. Otherwise the court would only have jurisdiction (if at all) based on its own conflict of laws rules.
So for example, under the recast Regulation, an employee who habitually works in England for a US employer can sue that employer in England whether or not the employer has an establishment here. There is no need for the court’s permission to serve proceedings on the defendant out of the jurisdiction.
Further information can be found on the HSF Litigation blog.
Key contacts
Samantha Brown
Managing Partner, Employment, Pensions and Incentives, UK and EMEA, London
Steve Bell
Managing Partner, Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety, Asia and Australia, Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Partner, Head of Employment, Pensions and Incentives, EMEA, Paris
Tim Leaver
Partner, London
Andrew Taggart
Partner, London
Fatim Jumabhoy
Partner, Head of Employment & Workplace Investigations, Asia, Singapore
Barbara Roth
Partner, New York
Christine Young
Partner, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.