Hong Kong does not currently have a dedicated artificial intelligence regulation. Instead, organisations must work within the framework of existing sectoral laws and regulatory guidance, overseen by various government bodies and regulators. These include the Digital Policy Office, the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD), the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau, the Intellectual Property Department, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, the Securities and Futures Commission, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, and the Insurance Authority. Sector-specific initiatives are increasingly shaping the regulatory landscape, with a focus on ethics, governance, and data protection principles for the responsible use of AI.

AI Strategy

Hong Kong's policy approach to AI is pragmatic, sector-led, and focused on facilitating innovation while maintaining existing regulatory safeguards.

Innovation and Adoption

In February 2025, the Hong Kong government announced the establishment of the Hong Kong AI Research and Development Institute, committing HK$1 billion (approximately US$128 million) to drive research, development, and adoption of AI technologies.

Toolkits and Frameworks

The Ethical Artificial Intelligence Framework  was published in June 2023 and subsequently updated on several occasions, most recently in December 2025, by the Digital Policy Office. Initially intended for government bureaux and departments, the Framework is now available for voluntary use by the private sector. It sets out ethical principles, an AI governance model, an AI lifecycle guide, and an impact assessment template. The framework provides voluntary guidance rather than mandatory rules. It encourages organisations to embed ethical principles, assess AI risks, and integrate AI governance into existing risk management and project governance processes.

Certain harmful AI practices, particularly those that infringe personal data rights, intellectual property, or national security, are expressly prohibited under prevailing laws. In addition, several sector-specific policy statements have been published, notably in banking and finance, healthcare, and insurance, signalling Hong Kong’s intention to embed ethical AI standards within key industries.

The Digital Policy Office has also published a voluntary Generative Artificial Intelligence Technical and Application Guideline  (most recently updated in December 2025), which aims to provide practical guidance for technology developers, service providers, and users of AI.

Certain harmful AI practices, particularly those that infringe personal data rights, intellectual property, or national security, are expressly prohibited under prevailing laws. In addition, several sector-specific policy statements have been published, notably in banking and finance, healthcare, and insurance, signalling Hong Kong’s intention to embed ethical AI standards within key industries.

Helpful resources

The Digital Policy Office has also published a voluntary Generative Artificial Intelligence Technical and Application Guideline  (most recently updated in December 2025), which aims to provide practical guidance for technology developers, service providers, and users of AI.

  • There is currently no dedicated AI-specific legislation in Hong Kong.
  • Existing laws and regulations, particularly relating to data protection, intellectual property, anti-discrimination, and cybersecurity, apply to AI applications by default.

From consumer protection law to online safety, AI continues to stretch existing legal frameworks. See the latest updates below.

The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO) is the primary legislation regulating personal data use in Hong Kong. In the AI context:

  • In August 2021, the PCPD published Guidance on the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. It recommends that organisations developing or deploying AI systems embrace the data stewardship values of respect, benefit, and fairness to stakeholders. The guidance aligns with international AI ethics frameworks and sets out seven core ethical principles: accountability, human oversight, transparency and interpretability, data privacy, fairness, beneficial AI, and reliability, robustness, and security.
  • Compliance with the guidance is voluntary, but the underlying requirements of the PDPO are mandatory, and organisations must ensure AI systems processing personal data uphold principles of fairness, transparency, purpose limitation, minimisation, accuracy, accountability, storage limitation, and security.
  • In June 2024, the PCPD released the Model Personal Data Protection Framework for Artificial Intelligence to support the Global AI Governance Initiative. The framework offers practical measures for organisations to establish AI governance strategies, conduct risk assessments, manage AI models securely, and engage transparently with stakeholders.
  • In March 2025, the PCPD issued a Checklist on Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI by Employees, encouraging organisations to define appropriate scopes of use, protect personal data privacy, ensure lawful and ethical use (including bias prevention), and monitor compliance with internal policies.
  • On 8 May 2025, the PCPD published a report to set out its major observations as regards the organisations’ data protection practices when they used AI based on the February 2025 compliance checks covering 60 local organisations across various sectors. The report found no contravention of the PDPO and provided recommended measures to organisations that develop or use AI. The compliance checks also examined the organisations’ implementation of the recommendations and best practices provided in the Model Personal Data Protection Framework. 
  • In September 2025 the PCPD along with 19 other privacy or Data Protection Authorities signed the "Joint Statement on Building Trustworthy Data Governance Frameworks to Encourage Development of Innovative and Privacy-protecting AI" at the 47th Global Privacy Assembly.
  • On 23 February 2026, the PCPD, together with 60 privacy or data protection authorities around the globe, issued the “Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery and the Protection of Privacy”, expressing concern about AI systems that generate realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge and consent, and other harmful content.  The co-signatories remind organisations to develop and use AI content generation systems lawfully and to adopt measures to protect the fundamental rights of data subjects, particularly children and vulnerable groups.
  • On 16 March 2026, the PCPD issued an alert regarding the privacy risks of OpenClaw and other agentic AI (which tend to pose higher risks than ordinary AI chatbots), setting out areas to note when collecting, using and processing personal data with agentic AI.

Overall, Hong Kong’s data protection regime requires organisations to integrate data protection by design and by default into AI projects and maintain accountability for AI-driven decisions impacting individuals.

The intersection of AI and intellectual property is an emerging area of focus in Hong Kong:

  • In July 2024, the Hong Kong Government - through the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau (CEDB) and the Intellectual Property Department (IPD) - launched a two-month public consultation that explores the enhancement of the Copyright Ordinance regarding the protection for AI technology development.
  • Under the existing Copyright Ordinance, works generated by AI are already protected by copyright. The consultation document investigates copyright protection of AI-generated works, copyright infringement liability for AI-generated works, the possible introduction of a specific copyright exception, and various other issues relating to generative AI.
  • The consultation paper proposes to introduce a new copyright infringement exception to allow reasonable use of copyright works for text and data mining, and computational data analysis and processing, for the training of AI models. The consultation period has now concluded, and a paper was submitted to the Legislative Council in February 2025 on the outcomes of the consultation. To foster the growth of AI technology, the Hong Kong Government considers it necessary to amend the Copyright Ordinance to introduce a specific text and data mining exception to allow reasonable use of copyright works for computation data analysis and processing without the licence of copyright owners. Although the Government initially aimed to introduce the amendment bill in the first half of 2025, no updates have yet been announced.

Competition

The Hong Kong Competition Commission (HKCC) – the principal competition authority in Hong Kong – does not have direct consumer protection powers outside of its competition law remit. Whilst conduct affecting digital markets remains one of the HKCC's three enforcement priorities, we are yet to see any AI-specific guidance or cases so far.

Consumer protection

Dr Yeung Sau Sing Albert brought an action (Dr Yeung Sau Sing Albert v Google Inc [2014] 4 HKLRD 493) for defamation on the basis that entering his name into Google Search generated suggested words that were defamatory to him by implying his involvement in criminal activities. The Court of First Instance allowed Dr Albert's claim to proceed past a summary dismissal application on the basis that Google designed and set up a search engine using autocomplete and related search features using AI, and there was an arguable case that Google was a "publisher" of the defamatory material (rather than a mere conduit or passive facilitator). Google expressed an interest in appealing the decision, but there has not been a reported appellate decision finally disposing of the case. Despite being a relatively old case, it remains a rare example of a Hong Kong court considering the legal implications of AI-drive automated outputs in a consumer-facing context. Find out more about the case in our blog post.

Investment 

Hong Kong has established an open environment for foreign direct investment, characterised by minimal restrictions and a strong commitment to free market principles. Foreign investment in the AI value chain has been actively encouraged, as evidenced by government-backed initiatives such as the Hong Kong Investment Corporation Limited's (HKIC) support for the launch of the Gobi‑HKU Fund I in March 2026, which is designed to support technology and AI‑adjacent start‑ups and facilitate the commercialisation of Hong Kong‑based research into global markets. In addition, there are no quota or tariff policies affecting AI and robotics trade with Mainland China, positioning Hong Kong as a strategic bridge for companies aiming to access the Mainland market. For example, in March 2026, the HKIC established the Hong Kong RISC‑V Alliance, aimed at strengthening Hong Kong’s role as a bridge between Mainland China and the international community for investment and research into semiconductor and computing infrastructure.

Financial Services

There is no central framework for regulating the use of AI in the financial services sector in Hong Kong. Instead, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) have published circulars and guidelines to outline their regulatory expectations in this area.

  • The FSTB issued a Policy Statement on the Responsible Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Financial Market in October 2024, setting out the government's 'dual-track' approach towards the responsible adoption of AI in the financial market and addressing potential challenges. The policy statement provides that financial institutions should formulate an AI governance strategy and adopt a risk-based approach in the procurement, use, and management of AI systems, with human oversight to mitigate the potential risks.
  • In November 2024, the SFC issued a circular on the use of generative AI language models that set out its expectations for licensed corporations that offer services or functionality provided by Generative AI language models (including as part of third party products) in respect of their regulated activities. It identified four core principles that licensed corporations may implement in a risk-based manner, specifically senior management responsibilities, AI model risk management, cybersecurity and data risk management, and third party provider risk management; the Appendix to the circular further lists non-exhaustive risk factors tied to each core principle. Aside from the circular, the SFC is participating in the International Organisation of Securities Commissions' Fintech Task Force AI Working Group - as part of which it will keep under review any findings or recommendations from such organisation to consider whether further regulatory guidance to SFC-licensed firms is necessary.
  • In November 2019, HKMA issued a circular that set out high-level principles to the banking industry on the use of AI applications, covering their governance, application design and development, and monitoring and maintenance. These principles are supplemented by publications including:
    • A report titled Fintech Adoption: Progress and Future Directions published on 16 July 2025, which highlights key observations from a tech maturity stock-take exercise (including significant advancements in the adoption of AI by the banking industry), and indicates plans to formulate a detailed blueprint of initiatives to further support the industry's adoption of sophisticated fintech, including AI.
    • A research paper titled Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Financial Services Space, published on 27 September 2024, which explores the transformative potential of generative AI and its implications for the financial industry, particularly in terms of operational efficiency, risk management, and customer engagement.
    • circular and Annex, issued on 9 September 2024, to explain how the use of AI can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of monitoring money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) risks. It also sets out the actions that the HKMA is taking to further support and accelerate the use of AI in authorised institutions’ monitoring processes, for example, establishing a dedicated team (supported by an external consultant) to provide supervisory feedback and technical guidance to assist authorised institutions in applying AI in enhancing their monitoring processes. The circular also requested authorised institutions with significant operations in Hong Kong to give due consideration to adopting AI in their ML/TF monitoring systems, and submit a feasibility study report and AI implementation plan to the HKMA by end of March 2025.  In a circular dated 19 November 2025, the HKMA noted that 48 authorised institutions had conducted the feasibility study and the vast majority agreed that AI was useful in making ML/TF monitoring systems more effective and risk-based.  To support authorised institutions' AI implementation efforts the HKMA has commenced a series of workshops on topics including approaches to innovating monitoring systems, AI use cases, and crypto asset-related ML/TF risks.  The HKMA has also observed in its 16 March 2026 circular the use of AI by authorised institutions to optimise sanctions screening processes.
    • circular, issued on 19 August 2024, to provide guiding principles on the use of GenAI in customer-facing applications from a consumer protection perspective. These build on the guiding principles the HKMA issued on 5 November 2019 in respect of the use of big data analytics and AI, focussing on four key aspects: governance and accountability, fairness, transparency and disclosure, and data privacy and protection. 
    • An insight article, shared on 23 May 2024, regarding the implications of AI on manpower management in the banking industry. In this context, the HKMA will publish an updated study on "Capacity Building for Future Banking" in 2025 to identify skills gaps in the banking industry for the next five years (2026 - 2030).
    • thematic review, published on 17 April 2024, of the design, implementation and optimisation of transaction monitoring systems. The review included an examination of how AI is used to optimise transaction monitoring systems and provided anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism specific guidance based on industry best practices.

From a more practical perspective, the HKMA has invited authorised institutions to participate in the GenAI Sandbox initiative launched in August 2024 in collaboration with the Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited (Cyberport). The GenAI Sandbox aims to promote responsible innovation in GenAI and empowers banks to pilot GenAI use cases within a risk-controlled environment across three critical domains, risk management, anti-fraud measures, and customer experience. The first cohort of the GenAI sandbox was announced in December 2024 and a report was published on 31 October 2025 highlighting the key findings and providing guidance to help banks address key challenges throughout the AI implementation lifecycle, including data preparation, model fine-tuning, output evaluation, and ongoing monitoring and optimisation.  The second cohort of the GenAI sandbox was announced on 15 October 2025, with use cases on "AI vs AI" strategies and advanced defence mechanisms against deepfake-related fraud.  On 5 March 2026, various financial regulators, including the SFC, the HKMA, the Insurance Authority, and the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority announced the launch of the GenAI Sandbox++, an expanded version of the 2024 sandbox covering multiple financial sectors under the remit of such regulators. 

Separately, the HKMA indicated in September 2025 that it was collaborating with a few like-minded central banks and regulators on a joint research project on an explainable AI toolkit, Project Noor, which was initiated by the Bank of International Settlements.

During the FinTech Week in November 2025, the HKMA announced "Fintech 2030", a forward-looking strategy for driving Kong Kong's fintech development, of which one of the four strategic pillars will focus on a new holistic AI strategy for authorised institutions.  As part of the "Fintech 2030" strategy, the HKMA published a Fintech Promotion Blueprint in February 2026, setting out a tactical framework to foster responsible innovation and advance fintech development in the banking sector.  One of the five key technology enablers and foundations in the blueprint is AI.

On 9 March 2026, the HKMA issued a circular requiring boards of directors of authorised institutions to oversee and endorse a formal strategic business plan, by 9 September 2026, to identify opportunities where technology can be used to adapt or transform product offerings, revenue models, customer engagement, risk management and operations.  A selection of authorised institutions will be invited to submit their plans via HKMA's survey tool.

The HKMA itself also utilises tech tools for conduct supervision, such as a workflow system powered by agentic AI and web-scraping technologies to detect and monitor misleading marketing claims, including the misuse of terms like 'bank' or 'deposit.

In addition:

  • On 3 November 2025, the Insurance Authority announced the publication of a whitepaper on federated learning, a machine learning technique that enables AI models to be trained on decentralised datasets residing on devices or servers, thereby complying with data privacy regulations while facilitating collaboration across different entities and sectors.
  • On 18 August 2025, the Insurance Authority indicated that updated guidelines will be issued in 2026 to provide regulatory clarity on the use of AI and facilitate AI adoption in a responsible way without creating unnecessary regulatory frictions or hurdles. It also launched the AI Cohort Programme to support insurers at all stages of technological maturity and to accelerate the responsible use of AI across the insurance industry. Seven insurers pledged as core participants of the AI Cohort and are committed to establishing an AI Centre of Excellence in Hong Kong to serve as a regional hub for AI innovation, supporting AI talent development through capability-building initiatives and contributing to knowledge sharing with the industry and regulators.
  • In 2023, the Insurance Authority outlined the responsibilities of insurers and intermediaries regarding the use of chatbots under the 'regulated activities' regime, reminding them to uphold the principles of fair customer treatment and enable fully informed customer decisions. The Insurance Authority is enhancing its Guideline on Cybersecurity by developing a Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework specific for the insurance sector. It will also conduct a Fintech survey to evaluate current technology adoption trends in the insurance sector, focusing on AI and related cybersecurity measures.

Helpful resources


Healthcare

On 3 January 2024, Hong Kong’s Medical Device Division (MDD) of the Department of Health issued a Technical Reference document TR-008: Artificial Intelligence Medical Devices which provides clarity for devices using AI and machine learning - including continuous learning capability - and the technical requirements expected for listing these medical devices on the Medical Device Administrative Control System.  This document applies to all AI medical devices that fall within the scope of the Medical Device Administrative Control System.


Key contacts

Leanette Ko photo

Leanette Ko

Associate, Hong Kong

Stay in the know

We’ll send you the latest insights and briefings tailored to your needs

Subscribe now
Sydney Perth Brisbane Melbourne Technology, media and entertainment, and telecommunications Emerging technology Artificial intelligence Technology Artificial Intelligence Tech Regulation Digital Transformation Emerging Technologies AI and Emerging Technologies Leanette Ko