The EAT has ruled that employment tribunals do not have jurisdiction to apportion liability between respondents to a discrimination claim. The same would apply in relation to joint and several liability for failures to inform and consult under TUPE.
Where two or more respondents are jointly and severally liable for a compensation award, the claimant can choose against whom to enforce the award. The EAT has ruled that an employment tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear a claim under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for the other respondent to contribute. More worryingly, the EAT also considered (obiter) that the civil courts' powers to apportion liability under the 1978 Act do not apply to employment tribunal claims either, leaving co-respondents with no route to claim a contribution. (Brennan v Sunderland City Council, EAT)
Key contacts
Samantha Brown
Managing Partner, Employment, Pensions and Incentives, UK and EMEA, London
Steve Bell
Managing Partner, Employment, Industrial Relations and Safety, Asia and Australia, Melbourne
Emma Rohsler
Partner, Head of Employment, Pensions and Incentives, EMEA, Paris
Tim Leaver
Partner, London
Andrew Taggart
Partner, London
Fatim Jumabhoy
Partner, Head of Employment & Workplace Investigations, Asia, Singapore
Barbara Roth
Partner, New York
Christine Young
Partner, London
Disclaimer
The articles published on this website, current at the dates of publication set out above, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.